
handle: 10017/64702
The study of Upper Cretaceous Cyclothyris from Spain and the revision of asymmetrical rhynchonellides from numerous European collections have led to improve some systematical, biostratigraphical and palaeobiogeographical questions, allowing to update taxonomically this group. The species studied here are the following: Cyclothyris difformis (Valenciennes in Lamarck, 1819); Cyclothyris nekvasilovae sp. nov.; Cyclothyris? contorta? (d?Orbigny, 1847); Cyclothyris zahalkai Nekvasilová, 1973; Cyclothyris segurai Berrocal-Casero, 2020; Cyclothyris cardiatelia Berrocal-Casero, 2020; Cyclothyris claudicans (Coquand, 1879); Cyclothyris globata (Arnaud, 1877); and Cyclothyris? vesicularis (Coquand, 1860). Starting from the preliminary interpretation about the functional meaning of the asymmetry in C. cardiatelia, a hypothesis about the origin of the obligate asymmetry in Upper Cretaceous Cyclothyris has been proposed here, which implies a phylogenetic relationship between C. segurai, C. cardiatelia, C. globata and, possibly, C.? vesicularis.
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Palaeobiogeography, Systematics, Geología, Geology, Cyclothyris, Upper Cretaceous, Obligate asymmetry
Palaeobiogeography, Systematics, Geología, Geology, Cyclothyris, Upper Cretaceous, Obligate asymmetry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
