
doi: 10.82308/6587
Collector interaction with mineral surfaces has long been studied. Little work has been done, however, on directly quantifying reagent adsorption, certainly under industrial process conditions. The use of a novel surface analysis technique, Headspace Analysis Gas-phase Infrared Spectroscopy (HAGIS), is suggested for quantification of adsorbed reagents in mineral processing. As a first exercise, a test system of xanthate adsorption onto lead sulphide minerals was studied. A survey of possible calibration standards (pure xanthate, a synthetic lead-xanthate, galena (PbS) and a lead sulphide ore conditioned with xanthate) resulted in linear curves for all four cases. The quantification of isopropyl xanthate adsorption onto batch flotation products (concentrate and tail) was used to determine that ore standards gave the most accurate results. The technique was also tested for quantification of adsorbed amines. Two collectors, dodecylamine and diphenylguanidine, and a depressant, triethylenetetramine, were studied. A common calibration curve was prepared using diphenylguanidine adsorbed on Inco matte. Results show that the HAGIS technique can easily be used to quantify adsorbed amines. It is concluded that the HAGIS technique is a powerful new tool for the quantitative determination of adsorbed reagents. The xanthate study showed the use of ores as standards produces the best calibration. The amine study introduced the possibility of analyzing reagent mixtures.
Finch, J. A. (Supervisor)
Engineering, Metallurgy
Engineering, Metallurgy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
