Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The lower permian dissorophoid «doleserpeton» (temnospondyli), and the evolution of modern amphibians

Authors: Sigurdsen, Trond;

The lower permian dissorophoid «doleserpeton» (temnospondyli), and the evolution of modern amphibians

Abstract

The origin and evolution of modern amphibians is still a subject of controversy. The amphibamid temnospondyl Doleserpeton has often been suggested as a close relative of modern amphibians, but the skeletal morphology of this important taxon has never been fully described. In this thesis, a study of the skeletal anatomy of Doleserpeton is presented, and the interrelationships of dissorophoids are discussed. The relationships of modern amphibians and Paleozoic tetrapods are studied using phylogenetic analyses based on both Bayesian inference and parsimony. The skull of Doleserpeton is preserved in such detail that it allows the first description of the inner ear of an amphibamid temnospondyl. It is found to house a posteriorly positioned perilymphatic duct, a feature which is today restricted to amphibians. Evidence for the presence of a frog-like tympanic annulus is also described. During the studies of the limb skeleton of Doleserpeton, it was realized that important features of the forelimb of modern salamanders were misinterpreted in previous anatomical descriptions. Comparisons of the forelimbs of salientians (frogs), caudates (salamanders) and the Lower Jurassic caecilian Eocaecilia reveal important shared derived traits that are also found in Doleserpeton. Humeral evidence also indicates that saltation was an important part of the locomotion of the Lower Triassic salientian Triadobatrachus. Previous phylogenetic analyses are reexamined and numerous problems in previous character coding are revealed. An analysis of the new data collected suggests that modern amphibians may be a monophyletic group closely related to dissorophoid temnospondyls.

L'origine des amphibiens modernes reste un sujet de controverse. Doleserpeton a longtemps été suggéré comme un proche parent des lissamphibiens, mais l'anatomie de ce spécimen important n'avait toujours pas été complètement décrite. La présente thèse porte sur ce spécimen énigmatique en comparant sa morphologie aux amphibiens modernes et fossiles. Ceci nous nous informe sur les liens phylogénétiques entre les amphibiens modernes et ceux datant du Paléozoique en utilisant des analyses basées sur la parcimonie ainsi que sur l'inférence bayésienne. Les conditions de préservation du crâne de Doleserpeton sont telles qu'elles permettent la première description de l'oreille interne d'un membre de ce groupe. Ceci a permis de trouver la présence de conduits périlymphatiques, un trait généralement réservé aux lissamphibiens. Les structures tympaniques rappellent aussi celles des anoures. Ces nouvelles études comparatives ont permis de corriger certaines informations au sujet de l'anatomie des membres supérieurs des salamandres. Les comparaisons anatomiques entre les anoures, les salamandres et le fossile Eocecilia datant du Jurassique présentent de nombreux caractères communs qui permettent de mieux situer les caractéristiques de Doleserpeton. Les données provenant de l'observation de l'humérus ont permis d'établir que la saltation était présente chez Triadobatrachus. De nouvelles analyses phylogénétiques ont été effectuées afin de rectifier les stades des caractères utilisés. Ces nouvelles analyses suggèrent une descendance commune des amphibiens modernes à partir d'un groupe relié aux temnospondyles dissorophoides.

Carroll, Robert L. (Supervisor1)

Green, David M. (Supervisor2)

Country
Canada
Related Organizations
Keywords

570, Biology - Zoology, Zoology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!