
doi: 10.82308/39140
Among the apparently simplest methods to determine bubble size in flotation systems are photographic techniques, ranging from photography through transparent walls to imaging of extracted bubbles. All capture images, which to varying degrees include overlapping, touching or out of focus bubbles. As manual counting limits the total number of bubbles, image analysis software is used to automate the process. Accuracy is thus dependent on image treatment, including counting method and filters. The McGill bubble size analysis method yields single plane, backlit images and utilises software that filters by shape factor. Proven effective for bubble size distributions ranging from approximately 0.5 to 3 mm, regular trends are observed when number (D10) and Sauter (D32) mean diameters are compared. When the method was extended to wide distributions typical of jetting spargers (e.g., 0.2--15 mm), no similar trends were evident. Revision of the analysis process for these two-phase systems included counting by number of holes, which reduced dependence on bubble shape. This allowed for inclusion of small and large bubbles, while excluding bubble clusters. A diameter assignment protocol reflecting individual bubble shape was also developed. Revised output distributions showed increased symmetry, and the D32 vs. D10 trend was recovered. Impact of sample tube diameter on the output bubble size distributions, and types of bias introduced were also investigated. A means of selecting an appropriate sample tube diameter for a given bubble population is presented.
This item was digitized as part of a project to share McGill's intellectual legacy with the public. If you are the copyright holder or a relative of the copyright holder who is deceased, you may request withdrawal by emailing escholarship.library@mcgill.ca. The full policy for eScholarship may be accessed here: https://www.mcgill.ca/libraries/research-services/escholarship/policy
Engineering, Metallurgy
Engineering, Metallurgy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
