
doi: 10.7912/c2/2966
handle: 1805/29510
Alternative RNA splicing is an important means of genetic control and transcriptome diversity. Alternative splicing events are frequently studied independently, and coordinated splicing controlled by common factors is often overlooked: The molecular mechanisms by which splicing regulators promote or repress specific pre-mRNA processing are still not yet well understood. It is well known that splicing factors can regulate splicing in a context-dependent manner, and the search for modulation of splicing factor activity via direct or indirect mechanisms is a worthwhile pursuit towards explaining context-dependent activity. We hypothesized that the combined analysis of hundreds of consortium RNA-seq datasets could identify trans-acting “modulators” whose expression is correlated with differential effects of a splicing factor on its target splice events in mRNAs. We first tested a genome-wide approach to identify relationships between RNA-binding proteins and their inferred modulators in kidney cancer. We then applied a more targeted approach to identify novel modulators of splicing factor SRSF1 function over dozens of its intron retention splicing targets in a neurological context using hundreds of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex samples. Our hypothesized model was further strengthened with the incorporation of genetic variants to impute gene expression in a Mendelian randomization-based approach. The modulators of intron retention splicing we identified may be associated with risk variants linked to Alzheimer’s Disease, among other neurological disorders, to explain disease-causing splicing mechanisms. Our strategy can be widely used to identify modulators of RNA-binding proteins involved in tissue-specific alternative splicing.
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)
alternative splicing, brain, Mendelian randomization, intron retention
alternative splicing, brain, Mendelian randomization, intron retention
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
