Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Tropical Gastroenter...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Tropical Gastroenterology
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Sarcina Ventriculi of Gastrointestinal Tract

A Clinicopathologic Study
Authors: Ritesh M Prajapati; Subhash K Nandwani; Mayank V Kabrawala; Nisharg B Patel; Priya V Arora; Krishna K Parekh;

Sarcina Ventriculi of Gastrointestinal Tract

Abstract

Background: Sarcina ventriculi, a gram-positive coccus, are occasionally found in gastric biopsies. Although Sarcina had been described more than 150 years ago, little is known about its pathogenicity in humans. Method: This retrospective case series included patients who were identified with Sarcina infection. We report clinicopathologic characteristics of 13 patients with Sarcina in gastric or duodenal biopsies. Result: The presenting symptoms included: epigastric discomfort (n=6), epigastric pain (n=4), anorexia (n=6), nausea and vomiting (n=5), constipation (n=2), diarrhoea (n=2) and weight loss (n=3). All patients had evidence of mucosal injury. Sarcina was found on mucosal surface.12 patients had food residue on oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD). 10 patients had gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), antral narrowing in 7 and duodenal obstruction in 3. 6 patients had malignant GOO. Causes of benign GOO included Helicobacter Pylorigastritis (n=1), eosinophilic gastritis (n=1) and duodenal ulcers (n=2, 1 NSAIDs). Of the 5 patients that had follow-up OGD, 2 had gastric residue. One patient had recurrence of symptoms with the persistence of sarcina on biopsy at 3 months. Symptoms improved at 6 months and no evidence of sarcina on biopsy at 6 months. Conclusion: Our findings suggest GOOcan be considered as a predisposing factor for Sarcina infection. Sarcina infection may not be the aetiology for GOObut may complicate recovery and may lead to life-threatening complications. Clinicians and pathologists must be aware of such microorganisms and must be documented in the histology report for further investigation and therapeutic consideration.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold