Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Delhi Journal of Oph...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Delhi Journal of Ophthalmology
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Delhi Journal of Ophthalmology
Article . 2019
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Linear versus Torsional Phacoemulsification: A Comparative Study

Authors: Rohan Mehra; Manisha Gupta; Tarannum Shakeel; Sushobhan Dasgupta;

Linear versus Torsional Phacoemulsification: A Comparative Study

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy between Linear and Torsional Phacoemulsification and the impact on the outcome of surgery based on corneal endothelial cell count, central corneal thickness, post operative inflammation and visual acuity. Methods: Patients having senile cataract with grade NS2-NS3 according to Lens Opacities Classification System III were included. Exclusion criteria included any disease that could hamper vision other than cataract. 108 eyes of 108 patients were studied. Of these, 54 patients were operated by the Torsional technique and 54 patients by the linear technique. Pre operative and post operative Day 1, Day 7, Day 15, Day 28 readings were taken. Results: The mean age of patients was 60.54 ± 7.06 (SD) years. On postoperative day 28, the endothelial cell loss was less in patients of torsional phacoemulsification technique (97.41 ± 28.61) as compared to linear technique (99.04 ± 26.09) (difference was not significant). Similarly, central corneal thickness in patients of torsional phacoemulsification technique (26.80 ± 11.07) on day 28 was statistically same as those who underwent linear technique (27.37± 6.76). 7.4% patients in the linear group and 7.4% patients in the torsional group had postoperative inflammation on day 1, which resolved on subsequent visits. BCVA on postoperative day 1 in patients of torsional group was 6/9 whereas linear group was 6/12. Conclusion: The torsional technique gives faster visual recovery than the linear technique. Although there was no statistically significant difference in terms of visual acuity, endothelial cell loss, postoperative corneal edema and postoperative inflammation between the two techniques as compared preoperatively and on post operative day 28.

Keywords

corneal endothelium loss, phacoemulsification, R, Medicine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
gold