Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Permanente Journ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Permanente Journal
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Article . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: PubMed Central
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Diagnostic Yield of Neck Mass Imaging: Impact of Clinician Specialty

Authors: Peter Debbaneh; Aida Martinez-Salazar; Quynh-Lam Tran; Sacha Moufarrej; Jacob E Hoerter; Nancy Jiang; Miranda Ritterman Weintraub; +1 Authors

Diagnostic Yield of Neck Mass Imaging: Impact of Clinician Specialty

Abstract

The objective was to compare the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of neck imaging studies ordered by otolaryngologists (OHNS) compared with non-OHNS clinicians and identify factors associated with higher imaging value in adult neck mass workup.Retrospective chart review was conducted on a cohort of patients who underwent neck mass imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound) from 2021-2022. Imaging studies for suspected thyroid masses, incidental findings, or surveillance of known masses were excluded. The authors analyzed the impact of clinician specialty and preimaging workup (physical examination, flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy, point-of-care ultrasound) on diagnostic yield.Imaging ordered by OHNS had a higher diagnostic yield than imaging by non-OHNS clinicians (78.6% vs 52.3%, P < .001). In contrast, lack of physical examination reduced yield to 42.4%. OHNS-ordered imaging also had higher therapeutic yield (45.9% vs 29.5%, P = .0437) and required less repeat imaging. Incidental findings were common (14%), with no difference between ordering specialties, and led to downstream testing in 59% of cases, with 1 case of papillary thyroid cancer.A triage model favoring initial OHNS consultation may reduce unnecessary imaging, associated costs, and patient burden.Imaging for adult neck masses ordered by OHNS clinicians was associated with significantly higher diagnostic and therapeutic yield. Preimaging evaluation, including flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy and point-of-care ultrasound, showed a further improvement in yield. These findings suggest OHNS evaluation prior to formal neck imaging may reduce unnecessary imaging studies.

Keywords

Male, Adult, Incidental Findings, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Otolaryngologists, Humans, Female, Thyroid Neoplasms, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Neck, Original Research, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research