Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ PubMed Centralarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
Cureus
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Preoperative Re-evaluation of Planned Orthognathic Surgical Procedures

Authors: Mutoh, Mami; Nakanishi, Ko; Tsuchiya, Saori; Kasai, Machiko; Matsushita, Kazuhiro; Yamamoto, Takaaki; Sato, Yoshiaki;

Preoperative Re-evaluation of Planned Orthognathic Surgical Procedures

Abstract

Objective: In surgical orthodontic treatment, a treatment plan is initially formulated. This plan is reviewed prior to surgery, and the surgical technique is often changed. This study aimed to provide insights into the surgical orthodontic treatment modification process. Methods: We included 501 patients who visited the Dental Treatment Center of Hokkaido University Hospital from April 2005 to March 2020 and underwent orthognathic surgery by March 2024. The survey items included whether the surgical technique had been changed, the details of any surgical changes, the discussion during the initial consultation, and the reasons for changing the surgical technique. The results were divided into three 5-year periods. Results: The surgical technique was changed in 138 cases (27.5%). The most common reasons for the change were jaw width, the amount of jaw movement, two occlusal planes, the amount of rotation or cant, and patient condition. Changes may also be attributed to the expanded scope of the surgical support at the time of initial planning and the introduction of insurance for anchor screws. The addition or omission of LeFort I was the most frequent surgical modification. Conclusions: In treating jaw deformities, the initial treatment should not be strictly adhered to without a preoperative review. Surgical planning should always be considered to reduce the patient's burden and optimize the stability of the occlusion.

Keywords

Dentistry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities