
Purpose The purpose of the study is to determine if instructional videos detailing the use of smartphone accessibility features may be used to improve quality of life and comfort with phone usage among patients with severe glaucoma. Design The design of the present study is an interventional case series. Methods The patients with vision loss due to severe glaucoma were recruited from one institution. Two surveys were completed to provide baseline data: one detailed their current use of smartphone accessibility features, and the other provided survey was the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) (EuroQol Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands), which is used to assess the quality of life. Then, the patients were shown a brief video with instructions on configuring the use of voice-over, magnification, and zoom functions, along with other features. To conclude, the patients completed the same surveys either at follow-up visits or by phone calls. Results Fifteen patients were recruited to participate in the study. At baseline, the participants used a median of one accessibility feature, with the most common feature being "text sizing/bolding." At follow-up, the participants averaged the gain of use of one accessibility feature and reported a decrease in text messaging visual limitation, although these findings did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the quality of life, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L, demonstrated a non-statistically significant increase of six points. Conclusions Despite the lack of statistical significance, our results indicate that providing instructional videos may benefit the patients' ability to navigate on their smartphones. Incorporating links or Quick Response (QR) codes to these instructional videos provides an opportunity to improve the quality of life at no additional risk to the patient. Further studies are needed with an increased population to investigate for any significance of our findings.
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
