Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Feature selection techniques are very useful approaches for dimensionality reduction in data analysis. They provide interpretable results by reducing the dimensions of the data to a subset of the original set of features. When the data lack annotations, unsupervised feature selectors are required for their analysis. Several algorithms for this aim exist in the literature, but despite their large applicability, they can be very inaccessible or cumbersome to use, mainly due to the need for tuning non-intuitive parameters and the high computational demands. In this work, a publicly available ready-to-use unsupervised feature selector is proposed, with comparable results to the state-of-the-art at a much lower computational cost. The suggested approach belongs to the methods known as spectral feature selectors. These methods generally consist of two stages: manifold learning and subset selection. In the first stage, the underlying structures in the high-dimensional data are extracted, while in the second stage a subset of the features is selected to replicate these structures. This paper suggests two contributions to this field, related to each of the stages involved. In the manifold learning stage, the effect of non-linearities in the data is explored, making use of a radial basis function (RBF) kernel, for which an alternative solution for the estimation of the kernel parameter is presented for cases with high-dimensional data. Additionally, the use of a backwards greedy approach based on the least-squares utility metric for the subset selection stage is proposed. The combination of these new ingredients results in the utility metric for unsupervised feature selection U2FS algorithm. The proposed U2FS algorithm succeeds in selecting the correct features in a simulation environment. In addition, the performance of the method on benchmark datasets is comparable to the state-of-the-art, while requiring less computational time. Moreover, unlike the state-of-the-art, U2FS does not require any tuning of parameters.
SUBSET-SELECTION, Technology, Science & Technology, Computer Science, Information Systems, Kernel methods, QA75.5-76.95, 46 Information and computing sciences, Dimensionality reduction, Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, 004, Manifold learning, STADIUS-20-94, Algorithms and Analysis of Algorithms, Computer Science, Theory & Methods, 0806 Information Systems, Electronic computers. Computer science, Computer Science, Unsupervised feature selection, ALGORITHM
SUBSET-SELECTION, Technology, Science & Technology, Computer Science, Information Systems, Kernel methods, QA75.5-76.95, 46 Information and computing sciences, Dimensionality reduction, Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, 004, Manifold learning, STADIUS-20-94, Algorithms and Analysis of Algorithms, Computer Science, Theory & Methods, 0806 Information Systems, Electronic computers. Computer science, Computer Science, Unsupervised feature selection, ALGORITHM
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 10 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts