
The neurophysiology of cells and tissues are monitored electrophysiologically and optically in diverse experiments and species, ranging from flies to humans. Understanding the brain requires integration of data across this diversity, and thus these data must be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). This requires a standard language for data and metadata that can coevolve with neuroscience. We describe design and implementation principles for a language for neurophysiology data. Our open-source software (Neurodata Without Borders, NWB) defines and modularizes the interdependent, yet separable, components of a data language. We demonstrate NWB’s impact through unified description of neurophysiology data across diverse modalities and species. NWB exists in an ecosystem, which includes data management, analysis, visualization, and archive tools. Thus, the NWB data language enables reproduction, interchange, and reuse of diverse neurophysiology data. More broadly, the design principles of NWB are generally applicable to enhance discovery across biology through data FAIRness.
Mouse, QH301-705.5, Science, Neurophysiology, neuroscience, Humans, rat, human, Biology (General), mouse, Ecosystem, data ecosystem, FAIR data, Metadata, archive, Q, Data Science, Neurosciences, R, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), data standard, data language, Rat, Medicine, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Software, Human, Neuroscience
Mouse, QH301-705.5, Science, Neurophysiology, neuroscience, Humans, rat, human, Biology (General), mouse, Ecosystem, data ecosystem, FAIR data, Metadata, archive, Q, Data Science, Neurosciences, R, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), data standard, data language, Rat, Medicine, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Software, Human, Neuroscience
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
