
Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in order to reduce bias, increase transparency and respond to author preferences. Funders are also getting involved.
Peer Review, Research, Publishing, bias, QH301-705.5, Science, Q, Feature Article, R, scientific publishing, Capital Financing, funding agencies, peer review, Medicine, Humans, Biology (General)
Peer Review, Research, Publishing, bias, QH301-705.5, Science, Q, Feature Article, R, scientific publishing, Capital Financing, funding agencies, peer review, Medicine, Humans, Biology (General)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
