Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Edinburgh Research A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Edinburgh DataShare
Doctoral thesis . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Making the past readable: a study of the impact of handwritten text recognition (HTR) on libraries and their users

Authors: Nockels, Joseph;

Making the past readable: a study of the impact of handwritten text recognition (HTR) on libraries and their users

Abstract

This thesis considers the socio-technical infrastructure surrounding AI-enabled Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR), the process of converting images of historical textual materials into computer-readable text. Despite sectoral awareness of the technology, institutional approaches still display gaps between conceptualising and operationalising HTR. The following main research question is answered: What is the impact of HTR on libraries, users, and the wider information environment? Foundational knowledge is provided by exploring HTR's relation to other computational methods and traditional areas of palaeography and papyrology. Through a mixed methods approach, including interviews with National Library of Scotland (NLS) staff, survey methods and thematic analysis, this thesis approaches HTR from multiple vantage points. It critically reflects on HTR’s affordances regarding library audience development by adapting digital engagement strategies, as well as the practicalities in embedding the technology within content-holding institutions. In aligning insights from HTR developers, providers and users, a technical fluency of how to operationalise HTR institutionally is presented. This informs an understanding of HTR’s potential near future implications on the information environment and research. Such analysis results in a set of recommendations for HTR’s future provision, directed thematically at libraries, HTR users and developers. These recommendations include ways to enhance institutional processes, such as digital preservation and audience engagement, in relation to HTR outputs; as well as assessing general HTR capability locally. Other recommendations involve enabling greater collaboration in HTR projects: through dataset sharing principles, standardised metadata and flexible tool usage.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

Collections as Data, Optical Character Recognition, Handwritten Text Recognition, Digital Libraries

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities