
doi: 10.7298/xp5p-2v92
handle: 1813/70024
199 pages ; Since the early works of Ajtai (STOC’96) and Regev (STOC’05), lattice-based cryptography has proven to be a powerful building block in cryptography. My research focuses on further exploring the expressive power of lattice-based cryptography, as well as formal verification of lattice-based cryptographic schemes. Deniable encryption (Canetti et al. CRYPTO ’97) is an intriguing primitive that provides a security guarantee against not only eavesdropping attacks as required by semantic security, but also stronger coercion attacks performed after the fact. The concept of deniability has later demonstrated useful and powerful in many other contexts, such as leakage resilience, adaptive security of protocols, security against selective opening attacks and coercion resistance in voting systems. Despite its conceptual usefulness, our understanding of how to construct deniable primitives under standard assumptions is restricted. We construct a flexibly bi-deniable Attribute-Based Encryption (ABE) scheme for all polynomial-size Branching Programs from Learning With Errors assumption (Regev STOC’05). Attribute based encryption (ABE) is an advanced encryption system with a built-in mechanism to generate keys associated with functions which in turn provide restricted access to encrypted data. Most of the known candidates of attribute based encryption model the functions as circuits. This results in significant efficiency bottlenecks, especially in the setting where the function associated with the ABE key admits a RAM program whose runtime is sublinear in the length of the attribute. We study the notion of attribute based encryption for random access machines (RAMs), introduced in the work of Goldwasser, Kalai, Popa, Vaikuntanathan and Zeldovich (Crypto 2013) and present a construction satisfying sublinear decryption complexity assuming Learning With Errors. We then introduce a symbolic approach for proving security of cryptographic constructions based on the Learning With Errors assumption (Regev, STOC 2005). Such ...
Attribute-based encryption, Learning with errors, 004
Attribute-based encryption, Learning with errors, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
