
doi: 10.7298/x43x84vd
handle: 1813/59593
The focus of this dissertation is the application of statistical learning and computational thinking to stubborn problems in development economics and welfare dynamics including the problems of poverty targeting, the identification of heterogeneous welfare dynamics, and the assessment of the risks and returns of diverse asset portfolios. Approaching such problems with statistical learning has allowed me to overcome some of the commonly imposed constraints and weaken some of the commonly made assumptions that prevent us from learning more about the empirical problem. By using out-of-sample validation and algorithmic model building, the first chapter presents an important step forward in making poverty targeting more accurate and efficient. The second chapter considers the theory and empirics of poverty and welfare dynamics more generally; the findings include several important implications for the study of welfare dynamics in diverse asset environments. The final chapter finds evidence consistent with a pattern in which households with greater initial asset holdings also hold a riskier portfolios and enjoy greater returns to their assets; however the analysis is limited by a poor accounting of human capital assets. The chapter concludes that allowing for the heterogeneity of assets, including non-physical assets, that may play a role in the livelihoods of households in developing countries is important. This dissertation demonstrates some of the ways in which algorithmic approaches can assist us in learning from the data.
statistical learning, welfare, 330, Economics, Agriculture economics, Poverty
statistical learning, welfare, 330, Economics, Agriculture economics, Poverty
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
