Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Assessment of PCBs, Selected Organic Pesticides and Mercury in Fishes from New Jersey: 1998-1999 Monitoring Program

Assessment of PCBs, Selected Organic Pesticides and Mercury in Fishes from New Jersey: 1998-1999 Monitoring Program

Abstract

Prior to this study, the most recent monitoring for organic contaminants and mercury in fish from New Jersey's coastal waters was in 1991. To assess the possible temporal and spatial changes in contamination since that time, and to provide more up-to-date and extensive monitoring data regarding contaminant levels in New Jersey fishes, this study was implemented in 1998. Over 300 samples were analyzed for polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides (e.g., DDT and its metabolites, and chlordanes) and mercury from locations extending from Raritan Bay tothe Delaware River and its tributaries. Using the US Food and Drug's Action Limits (as well as state-promulgated guidelines), a cursory assessment of risk based on exceedances of these limits was made. Based on the number, species and locations of the exceedances of US FDA actionlimits for PCBs and chlordanes, the following regions of concern were designated: 1) the Camden area (Newton Lake, Strawbridge Ponds, Pennsauken River and Cooper River Lake),based largely on chlordane concentrations within common carp, 2) sections of the Delaware River and its tributaries (e.g., Raccoon Creek) based on PCB concentrations, mainly in American eel, and 3) Raritan Bay, based on higher than average concentration of PCBs in American eels (and white perch). Comparisons with historical data sets were made. For most species and regions, concentrations of PCBs and chlordanes have decreased markedly compared to evaluations made a decade ago. Changes in DDX are more equivocal, with some groups showing decreases, but with little evidence of change for other comparisons. The observed decreasescould be due to environmental cleanup, pollution prevention programs, degradation, or changes in the bioavailability of contaminants.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!