
doi: 10.7251/sin2403007s
Rad razmatra Kantovo eksplicitno oponiranje Hobbesu izloženo u središnjem dijelu teksta O uobičajenoj izreci: To bi u teoriji moglo biti ispravno, ali ne vrijedi u praksi, iz 1793. godine. Cilj rada je da se analizom sadržaja, kao i specifičnog načina Kantovog obraćanja Hobbesu, pokuša pokazati kako se Kantova kritika Hobbesa paralelno može čitati i kao implicitna kritika apsolutizma njegovog sopstvenog vladara, Fridricha Wilhelma II, te da je to možda i prikriveni motiv Kantovog obraćanja Hobbesu u kontekstu navedenog spisa.
nepravičnost, H, otpor, Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, B, apsolutizam, Social Sciences, neotuđiva prava, prirodni zakon
nepravičnost, H, otpor, Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, B, apsolutizam, Social Sciences, neotuđiva prava, prirodni zakon
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
