
doi: 10.7238/a.v0i18.3049
O termo transmedia storytelling tornou-se viral na área dos media studies. Mas, em que medida é que este termo define um fenómeno verdadeiramente novo e diferente dos conceitos já conhecidos de adaptação e transficcionalidade? O que significa realmente contar uma história através de diferentes media e em que condições isto é uma mais-valia? Neste artigo, serão avaliados vários tipos de projetos que se podem considerar de transmedia storytelling, embora não se enquadrem necessariamente no paradigma transmedia da ‘Costa Oeste’ dos Estados Unidos (i.e. Hollywood), bem como analisados três tipos de discurso associados a este fenómeno – o discurso da indústria, o discurso dos fãs e o discurso académico –, esperando poder diferenciar este último dos outros dois e, assim, definir alguns dos seus objetivos.
The term fransmedia storytelling has gone viral in media studies. But to what extent does it label a truly new phenomenon, different from the older concepts of adaptation and transfictionality? What does it really mean to tell a story through different media and under what conditions is it desirable? In this article, I examine several types of projects that could be considered as ‘transmedia storytelling’, without necessarily fitting within the paradigm of ‘West Coast’ (i.e. Hollywood) fransmedia, and I look at three types of discourse associated with the phenomenon - the industry discourse, the fan discourse and scholarly discourse - in the hope of distinguishing scholarly discourse from the other two and defining some of its goals.
transmedia storytelling, narratologia, discurso da indústria, comportamento dos fãs, mitologia, transficcionalidade., transmedia storytelling, narratology, industry discourse, fan behaviour, mythology, transfictionality.
transmedia storytelling, narratologia, discurso da indústria, comportamento dos fãs, mitologia, transficcionalidade., transmedia storytelling, narratology, industry discourse, fan behaviour, mythology, transfictionality.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
