
Much has been made in recent years of increasing the choice of the citizen-consumer.This article argues that the concept of ‘increasing choice’ is far more problematic than at first appears and has little intrinsic value in itself.Choice is only to be valued in itself in the sense that the process of choices or decision-making plays a part in our own preferences.To justify the introduction of the market process on the grounds of increasing choices is doubly wrong; first, increasing choices is not in itself valuable and, secondly, what is valuable about tha market has little to do with choice.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
