
doi: 10.7202/1087937ar
Cet article fait part d’une expérience éditoriale, de collecte et de compilation, pour la création d’un cédérom portant sur la culture traditionnelle de l’Ecosse du Nord : Northern Folk (Aberdeen, The Elphinstone Institute, 1999), coédité par Valentina Bold et Tom McKean sous la supervision de James Porter. Autant qu’il souligne la nature de collaboration de ce projet (en termes de financement, de sources d’archives et d’entrevues menées pour l’occasion), il explore le contenu de Northern Folk, mettant l’accent sur les avantages et les pièges d’une publication multi-média. L’auteur évoque également son projet actuel, le volet suivant, explorant la culture traditionnelle de l’Écosse du Sud. En partageant son expérience, Valentina Bold peut formuler quelques recommandations pour la publication future de cédéroms à base de matériel ethnographique.
This article reflects on the editorial experience of collection and compilation in the generation of a CD-ROM about the traditional culture of Northern Scotland: Northem Folk (Aberdeen: The Elphinstone Institute, 1999), coedited by Valentina Bold and Tom McKean, under the general editorship of James Porter. As well as outlining the collaborative nature of the project (in terms of funding, archivai sources and specially-conducted interviews), it surveys the contents of Northern Folk, highlighting the advantages, and pitfalls, in multi-media publication. The writer reflects, too, on her current project: a companion volume exploring the traditional culture of Southern Scotland. Sharing her experience of such a project, Valentina Bold can make recommendations for the publication of future CD-ROMs dealing with ethnological material.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
