Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Farmeconomia. Health...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Farmeconomia. Health economics and therapeutic pathways
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Economic Implication of Targeting Higher Trough Level with Extended Half-Life FVIII Prophylaxis

Authors: Carla Fornari; Stefania Antonacci; Stefano Stoppa; Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani; Giancarlo Castaman; Paolo Angelo Cortesi;

Economic Implication of Targeting Higher Trough Level with Extended Half-Life FVIII Prophylaxis

Abstract

AIM: This analysis aimed to assess the annual International Unit (IU) consumption and costs of prophylaxis therapies with extended half-life recombinant FVIII (EHL-rFVIII), targeting a traditional trough level of 1% and the higher levels of 3% and 5% recommended by recent guidelines and expert consensus, using a theoretical pharmacokinetic model. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic model was developed to calculate annual treatment IU consumption and costs of EHL-rFVIII products to sustain different trough levels (1%, 3% and 5%) in adult patients with hemophilia A in Italy. The model assumed a one-year perspective and assessed two scenarios: one with lower frequency of administration and one with higher frequency. RESULTS: The related annual treatment per-patient cost increased as the trough level increased. The per-patient annual cost was €117,811 to achieve a trough level of 1%, €351,543 to achieve a 3% trough level and €585,905 to achieve a 5% trough level. The increase in dose frequency (alternative scenario), that is the reduction of time between infusions, reduced the estimated doses to achieve the pre-defined FVIII levels. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the need for further discussion about the trough levels to target with the actual EHL-rFVIII and the prophylaxis dose and regimen selection for each patient, also considering all treatment options available and the economic implications.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold