
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of tax collection mechanisms in the Indonesian tax system and assess the extent to which legal protection for taxpayers is implemented in practice. Tax collection, which is divided into passive and active approaches, has direct implications for public fiscal compliance and state revenue. Although the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (UU KUP) regulates taxpayer rights such as objections, appeals, and reductions in administrative sanctions, various normative and practical barriers remain that create legal uncertainty, especially for small taxpayers. This study also examines the role of external oversight through the Indonesian Ombudsman and the importance of an educational approach in increasing voluntary compliance. The results of this study emphasize the need for a more equitable and transparent reformulation of tax collection policies to create a balance between state interests and the protection of citizens' rights.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
