Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Código 31 revista de...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

ChatGPT

uma ferramenta para a pesquisa científica?
Authors: Gisele da Silva Rodrigues; Valéria Ramos de Amorim Brandão; Rosana Matos da Silva Trivelato;
Abstract

Este estudo investiga o potencial do ChatGPT como ferramenta para automatizar e otimizar o processo de revisão de literatura científica. Prescrutando a literatura e realizando experimento aplicado, as autoras exploram a eficácia dos grandes modelos de linguagem, especialmente o ChatGPT, além de conduzirem uma análise comparativa para determinar a confiabilidade, consistência e vantagens dessas tecnologias em relação aos métodos tradicionais de revisão. O presente artigo, apresenta resultados obtidos na primeira etapa do experimento. Por meio de metodologia rigorosa, foram selecionados, por intermédio exclusivo do ChatGPT, e confrontados estudos recentes que destacam tanto as capacidades transformadoras quanto as limitações éticas e práticas do uso de inteligência artificial em pesquisa. Os resultados iniciais sugerem que o ChatGPT pode significativamente complementar as revisões conduzidas por humanos, oferecendo insights inovadores e eficiência aprimorada, desde que manuseados com prudência e expertise instalada. Fica notória a necessidade de considerar dentro desses procedimentos assistidos por inteligência artificial os desafios éticos relacionados ao viés algorítmico e à integridade acadêmica.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold