
doi: 10.69613/vb34jc43
Evidence-based medicine involves systematic research evaluation with clinical expertise for optimal patient care. The hierarchy of evidence ranges from meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials to case reports and expert opinions, each with distinct strengths and limitations. Critical appraisal skills enable evaluation of study validity, results significance, and clinical applicability. The GRADE approach provides a systematic framework for rating evidence quality and recommendation strength based on study design, execution, consistency, directness, and precision. Implementation strategies incorporate evidence synthesis into clinical workflows through standardized protocols, decision support tools, and continuous quality assessment mechanisms. Barriers to evidence implementation include resource limitations, knowledge gaps, and organizational constraints, necessitating targeted interventions for successful integration into practice.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
