
doi: 10.69554/vncs9198
The 2008 financial crisis revealed a critical flaw in the incurred credit loss model. Banks had to wait for losses to incur before increasing loss provisions. As a result, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) have both proposed their own versions of a ‘current expected credit loss’ (CECL) model to replace their incurred loss model. The CECL estimate would reflect bank managers’ current estimate of the contractual cash flows that the bank does not expect to collect, based on their assessment of credit risk as of the reporting date. The CECL model is expected to bring increased financial stability along with other benefits. However, the new model poses major implementation challenges, specifically the need to forecast lifetime expected credit losses. This article provides bank managers with the knowledge they need to navigate the most common industry modelling options available to them for addressing these challenges. To do this the authors provide insight into how common credit loss models compare in terms of strengths, limitations and considerations for improving lifetime loss forecasting accuracy.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
