Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Winning vendors over to e-payments

Authors: Hubert Jolly;

Winning vendors over to e-payments

Abstract

Electronic payment is poised for expansion, with more businesses getting into the game to gain the benefits of reduced costs for payer and payee alike, faster processing, improved transparency and lower risks of fraud and theft. But the B2B industry's migration to an automated environment is cautious at best, despite the undeniable financial and operational gains for all — corporates, vendors and financial institutions. Cheque payments still account for 80 per cent of the total wholesale payment cycle, according to recent research by the Aite Group. The reason? Adopting a new technology requires abolishing familiar, time-tested routines and transforming high-volume processes and the IT resources to support it. The paper suggests how corporates (accounts payable and procurement organisations) can encourage their vendors to implement electronic payment relationships to save money, and how banks and electronic invoicing presentment and payment providers can put e-payments into practice, making the e-payment relationship a win-win proposition for all. In particular, the paper advocates partnerships between corporates and banks to launch campaigns that educate vendors on e-payment migration — with a case study demonstrating the success of such a campaign. The paper closes with a broader outlook on the payment industry as a whole and enumerates some of the capabilities vendors will be looking for in the next generation of electronic payment solutions, such as automated clearing house and wires. It strategically weighs the different electronic payment methods to which they aim to convert their vendors for maximum benefit.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!