Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Exploring the practicalities and quality of pentesting at scale : Globally, pentest coverage is increasing but remains insufficient

Authors: Caroline Wong;

Exploring the practicalities and quality of pentesting at scale : Globally, pentest coverage is increasing but remains insufficient

Abstract

Over the course of the last two years, we have seen cybercrime increase during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. But despite this increase, most organisations do not do enough pentesting to combat cyberattacks. This paper explores the practicalities and quality of pentesting at scale to help organisations understand the importance of implementing a pentesting programme. Too often, development, security and operations work in silos. Organisations must work together to create a cohesive partnership. As an industry, we must decide that we want to fix things, and then we have to do it. It is not going to be easy, but it is simple. We need to work together — security practitioners and engineers — to collaboratively decide that it is important enough to get asset inventory right. Organisations must decide that it is important enough to update their software, install patches when software is vulnerable and implement a pentest programme. Security leaders must decide to look for the vulnerabilities that are exploitable and find them and fix them.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!