
handle: 11393/361910 , 11587/571047
This article examines gender inequality in Italian academia, focusing on Political Science (SPS/04) compared with the broader Area 14 (Social and Political Sciences) and General Sociology (SPS/07), between 2005 and 2020. The period allows an assessment of changes over time, especially after the Gelmini reform (law 240/2010) and restrictions on turnover. Using original datasets and segregation indexes, we trace women’s representation across academic career stages. Political Science shows persistent gender imbalance from the outset: women are underrepresented among postdocs and junior assistant professors (RTDA), and this disadvantage carries forward through the entire career ladder. By contrast, Area 14 shows stronger feminization at entry with women forming the majority among postdocs and nearing parity at RTDA, but faces sharper barriers at promotion, particularly to full professorships. General Sociology follows yet another pattern: women dominate at entry and are close to parity at mid-career, but their presence declines at the top. These findings highlight distinct configurations of gender inequality in Italian academia.
gender inequalities, academia, glass door, glass ceiling, political science, Italy, gender gap, glass ceiling, glass door, academic recruiting
gender inequalities, academia, glass door, glass ceiling, political science, Italy, gender gap, glass ceiling, glass door, academic recruiting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
