
doi: 10.64651/8-2-4
handle: 20.500.12556/RUL-180594
The paper addresses the concept of progress through an examination of different paradigms in the natural and social sciences. By considering how progress relates to various theoretical frameworks, it analyzes the distinction between teleology and evolution; scientific attempts to reconstruct a theory of history; definitions of capitalism that imply continuous and discontinuous conceptions of historical development; and different perspectives on premodern and modern institutions. The discussion concludes by outlining the implications these concepts hold for understanding modernity and progress. In doing so, the paper seeks to provide a nuanced account of how progress is portrayed in contemporary academic literature.
info:eu-repo/classification/udc/930:141.82, napredek,modernost,kapitalizem,historični materializem,nova institucionalna ekonomija, progress,modernity,capitalism,historical materialism,New Institutional Economics
info:eu-repo/classification/udc/930:141.82, napredek,modernost,kapitalizem,historični materializem,nova institucionalna ekonomija, progress,modernity,capitalism,historical materialism,New Institutional Economics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
