
The main objective of this article was to provide an extensive comparative investigation of the treatment and acceptance of digital evidence within the legal frameworks of Pakistan and China. In recent times, both nations have recognized the profound influence of technology on present-day culture. The acknowledgment of this phenomenon has prompted them to adopt strategies targeted at governing and effectively incorporating digital evidence into their separate judicial systems. In order to achieve this objective, the study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the relevant legislative provisions in both countries, investigates notable instances that illustrate the treatment of digital evidence within their respective legal frameworks, and investigates the prevailing strategies that have been used. The primary goal was to derive useful lessons and insights from these comparative observations, with the aim of subsequently applying them to a global environment.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
