Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Nuevas metas terapéuticas en el tratamiento de las dislipemias: colesterol no HDL y remanentes de colesterol

Authors: Máxima Mendez-Castillo; María Alexandra López; Persio López; Pedro W Díaz Ruiz;

Nuevas metas terapéuticas en el tratamiento de las dislipemias: colesterol no HDL y remanentes de colesterol

Abstract

Non-HDL-C is a powerful indicator of lipoproteins rich in ApoB. Its measurement is much simpler, it does not require fasting to quantify it, not being influenced by triglyceride levels, and it is an excellent marker of atherogenic cholesterol, with a better correlation with cardiovascular risk than LDL-C. In patients in high risk of atherogenic dyslipidemia, the strategy of consideringnon-HDL-C as a primary objective is allowed, because it incorporates the risk of lipid origin better than LDL-C and because it is more feasible than measuring ApoB. The therapeutic objective of non-HDL-C is to add 30 mg/dL to the calculated LDL-C target value; in the general population, optimal non-HDL-C levels of less than 130 mg/dL are maintained. In a patient considered in very high risk, the target LDL-C is less than 55 mg/dL; thus their non-HDL-C should not exceed 85 mg/dL. Non-HDL cholesterol becomes an excellent indicator of total atherogenic cholesterol. And it is a primary therapeutic objective in individuals with atherogenic dyslipidemia. Evidence available to date shows the benefit of adding ethyl eicosapentaenoic acid to patients with elevatednon-HDL cholesterol under optimal treatment with statins, for reducing cardiovascular risk. Fibrates may be considered in patients with extreme hypertriglyceridemia.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!