Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Tren penggunaan metode penelitian pendidikan pada Jurnal Internasional

Authors: null Asep Abdurrohman;

Tren penggunaan metode penelitian pendidikan pada Jurnal Internasional

Abstract

The use of methods and origins of researchers in international journals is very diverse. Both journals published in the western and eastern parts of the world. This research aims to examine trends in the use of methods and researchers' origins in international journals through the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) media as the search center. In ERIC, there are two journals studied by researchers, namely the European Journal of Educational Research (EU-JER) which has 30 journals and the Turkish Online Journal (TOJ) which has 29 journals. To study it, researchers used Content Analysis. Content Analysis is a scientific analysis of the message content of a communication. Technically, the scope of content analysis includes; classification of signs used in communication, using criteria as a basis for classification, and using certain analytical techniques as a prediction maker. There are three conditions in content analysis, namely; objectivity, systematic approach, and generalization. The research results show that the trend in using research methods in the European Journal of Educational Research (EU-JER) is 50% using qualitative methods. Meanwhile, in TOJ, the trend in using research methods is the opposite of EU-JER, namely 48% quantitative. Meanwhile, 100% of the researchers at EU-JET come from Indonesia. Meanwhile, in TOJ the authors are a mixture of domestic and foreign writers. Domestically 69% and overseas 31%.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!