
doi: 10.62791/20218
Machiavellianism and deceptive mating tactics can ruin relationships if they go unnoticed. Previous research has shown that people have interpersonal accuracy, the ability to accurately judge certain qualities in other people. We explored interpersonal accuracy for two new qualities, Machiavellianism and deceptive mating tactics of strangers role-playing videotaped responses to being interviewed for an online dating site. Participants watched video clips of senders talking for a short time and rated the senders’ Machiavellianism and deceptive mating tactics. Interpersonal accuracy in the detection of these characteristics was obtained by comparing the receivers’ average ratings to the self-ratings of the senders. We also explored the impact of receivers’ social skills, Machiavellianism, and gender on interpersonal accuracy in judging Machiavellianism and deceptive mating tactics in others. Implications of these findings for research in interpersonal accuracy and social relationships is discussed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
