Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ IACR Communications ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2025
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

On the Key-Commitment Properties of Forkcipher-based AEADs

Authors: Mostafizar Rahman; Samir Kundu; Takanori Isobe 0001;

On the Key-Commitment Properties of Forkcipher-based AEADs

Abstract

Forkcipher-based AEADs have emerged as lightweight and efficient cryptographic modes, making them suitable for resource-constrained environments such as IoT devices and distributed decryption through MPC. These schemes, including prominent examples like Eevee (Jolteon, Espeon, and Umbreon), PAEF, RPAEF, and SAEF, leverage the properties of forkciphers to achieve enhanced performance. However, their security in terms of key commitment, a critical property for certain applications such as secure cloud services, as highlighted by Albertini et al. (USENIX 2022), has not been comprehensively analyzed until now. In this work, we analyze the key-commitment properties of forkcipher-based AEADs. We found that some of the forkcipher-based AEAD schemes lack key-commitment properties, primarily due to the distinctive manner in which they process associated data and plaintext. For two different keys and the same nonce, an adversary can identify associated data and plaintext blocks that produce identical ciphertext-tags with a complexity of O ( 1 ) . Our findings apply to various forkcipher-based AEADs, including Eevee, PAEF, and SAEF, and naturally extend to less strict frameworks, such as CMT-1 and CMT-4. These findings highlight a significant limitation in the robustness of forkcipher-based AEADs. While these modes are attractive for their lightweight design and efficiency, their deployment should be restricted in scenarios where explicit robustness or key-commitment security is required.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
gold