
Complete development with 92% survival was observed when the larvae were fed with the mixed diet (DE) of Coscinodiscus sp. and Artemia nauplii in 23.18 days, which was followed by Artemia nauplii (E) alone (89.6%) in 24,95 days, Coscinodiscus sp. (D) alone (2.1%) in 29.11 days, the mixture (ABCDE) of Thalassiothrix longissima, Nitzschia sp., Skeletonema sp. Coscinodiscus sp., and Artemia nauplii (90%) in 25.22 days and the mixture (CD) of Skeletonema sp. and Coscinodiscus sp. (25.6%) in 29.66 days. Incomplete development was observed i.e. upto third zoeal stage, when larvae fed with Thalassiothrix longissima (A) and Nitzschia sp. (B) (12% and 18%) in 12.6 and 14.05 days, respectively. It was followed by Skeletonema sp. (C) and mixture of Thalassiothrix longissima and Nitzschin sp. (AB), Skeletonema sp. and mixture of Thalassiothrix longissima, Nitzschia sp. and Coscinodiscus sp. (ABCD) (16.6%, 13.3% and 18%) in 16.09, 18.77 and 13.64 days, respectively, in which the development is only upto fourth zoeal stage.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
