Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Patient Experiences with AI in Healthcare Settings

Authors: Marjan Hoseini;

Patient Experiences with AI in Healthcare Settings

Abstract

This study aims to explore patient experiences with AI in healthcare settings, identifying their perceptions, concerns, and the perceived impact of AI on their care. The objective is to provide insights into patient attitudes towards AI, which can inform the development, implementation, and policy-making of AI technologies in healthcare. We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 26 participants who have interacted with AI-driven healthcare services. Participants were selected to represent a diverse range of ages, backgrounds, and experiences. Thematic analysis was employed to identify major themes and categories from the interview data, focusing on patient perceptions, experiences, and expectations of AI in healthcare. Five major themes emerged from the data: Understanding and Perceptions; Quality and Accessibility; Integration and Adaptation; Operational Challenges; and Patient Empowerment and Engagement. These themes encompassed various categories, including AI literacy, privacy concerns, care personalization, technical issues, and patient rights, among others. The findings highlight a general optimism about the potential of AI to improve healthcare outcomes, coupled with significant concerns about data privacy, ethical use, and the need for greater patient education and involvement in AI development. Patients perceive AI as a potentially transformative force in healthcare but underscore the importance of addressing ethical considerations, ensuring transparency, and enhancing patient engagement in the deployment of AI technologies. The study advocates for a patient-centered approach in the development and implementation of AI in healthcare to maximize its benefits while mitigating challenges.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!