Following the introduction of Western intellectual currents into Iran and, subsequently, the occurrence of the Constitutional Revolution, transformations took place in the ideological system of the people—particularly among politicians, literati, and poets—which led to the emergence of intellectuals in these domains. With the rise of this movement, a wide spectrum of intellectual tendencies appeared in Iran, some of which paid significant attention to the issue of women. For instance, woman in the concept of land and homeland, or woman in the sense of the feminine gender, can be observed in the three panels of Maryam Mirzadeh-ye Eshqi or Iran-e Khanom by Reza Baraheni. In the present study, which has been prepared using a descriptive–analytical method, the intellectual construction of poet–intellectuals such as Lahouti, Shamlou, and Farrokhzad concerning the concept of woman as feminine gender is examined. Each poet–intellectual has a distinct construction and perception of the concept of woman in their thought, derived from their cultural and social contexts. The purpose of poet–intellectuals may be to raise women’s awareness of their rights, to liberate them from stereotypical molds, and to lead them toward awareness, equality, and empowerment, enabling them to break free from the constraints of a patriarchal society. The findings of the study indicate that elements such as the pursuit of freedom, patriotism, resistance against despotism, defense of women’s rights, justice-seeking, opposition to foreign domination, pursuit of knowledge, and the promotion of collective awareness are among the prominent characteristics of the poetry of these poets. Lahouti, Shamlou, and Farrokhzad considered the most important reasons for women’s intellectual and cultural backwardness and lack of social standing to be male dominance and authority over women, the absence of women in society in terms of education and employment, the lack of advocacy by women themselves, and similar issues. The study also shows that Shamlou addressed this concept more profoundly than Lahouti and Farrokhzad, and their similar as well as different perspectives are presented.