
doi: 10.61409/v20258
pmid: 41363233
Introduction: Dermatological topical agents are usually valued for their pharmacological effects, yet their aesthetic Christmas potential remains unexplored. This study tested seven coloured topical agents (tar, methylrosaniline, potassium permanganate, cadexomer iodine, silver nitrate, ferric sulfate and ketoconazole shampoo) as alternative Christmas decorations. Methods: Preparations were applied to terracotta baubles and a pork roast, and their Christmas aesthetics were rated on a five-point scale by colleagues at department of Dermatology and Venereology at Aarhus University Hospital. Results: All products produced visible colouring but presented practical challenges: prolonged drying (iodine, silver nitrate, ferric sulfate, ketoconazole), difficult consistency (iodine, ferric sulfate), strong odour (tar) and heavy straining (methylrosaniline). Methylrosaniline, potassium permanganate and ketoconazole achieved the highest aesthetic scores, whereas iodine was least suitable due to poor appearance, dying time and cost. The study has limitations: pork roast is not representative for all kinds of food or human skin, and safety concerns preclude ingestion. Certain preparations, including methylrosaniline and potassium permanganate, have documented systemic toxicity when ingested. Conclusion: Dermatology’s colourful topical agents show unexpected potential for festive Christmas decoration. Further research should address durability, safety, and optimization of practical properties – possibly in combination with glitter.
Swine, Administration, Topical, Humans, Animals, Dermatologic Agents, Coloring Agents, Holidays
Swine, Administration, Topical, Humans, Animals, Dermatologic Agents, Coloring Agents, Holidays
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
