
doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v28 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v27 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v23 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v29 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v19 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v24 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v26 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v22 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v25 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v20
doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v28 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v27 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v23 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v29 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v19 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v24 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v26 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v22 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v25 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.5433316.v20
The prospect of an up-coming quantum computer revolution is big news these days, with some technologists predicting that a scalable quantum computer is a mere 4 - 5 years away. It has even been claimed -by D-Wave cofounder Eric Ladizinsky- that this prospective revolution will be civilization's next big revolution. The truth is that quantum computers that are anything more than toys are, not merely difficult to engineer, but mathematically impossible, and based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the relationship between classical and quantum physics.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
