
Psychological safety is a critical yet often overlooked component in ensuring patient safety within healthcare environments. This paper explores the intrinsic link between psychological safety and patient outcomes, highlighting how a culture of openness, trust, and non-punitive communication can significantly enhance healthcare delivery. Psychological safety enables healthcare professionals to voice concerns, report errors, and contribute to team discussions without fear of retribution, fostering a just culture that prioritises learning and continuous improvement.Through an in-depth analysis of research studies, this paper examines the impact of psychological safety on team dynamics, error reporting, and organisational performance. Evidence suggests that structured communication tools, leadership strategies, and training programs focused on psychological safety contribute to a stronger safety culture. Case studies demonstrate how interventions such as TeamSTEPPS training, just culture frameworks, and peer support programs lead to improved staff well-being, reduced burnout, and enhanced patient safety.The findings underscore the necessity for healthcare leaders and policymakers to integrate psychological safety into safety initiatives, training curricula, and institutional policies. By cultivating an environment where staff feel empowered to speak up and collaborate effectively, healthcare organisations can minimise medical errors, improve patient outcomes, and create a sustainable culture of safety. Future research should focus on evaluating the long-term impact of psychological safety interventions on clinical outcomes and exploring strategies to embed these principles within diverse healthcare settings.
Psychological Safety, Patient Safety
Psychological Safety, Patient Safety
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
