Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Quaestio Factiarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Quaestio Facti
Article . 2024
Data sources: DOAJ
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/b2...
Other literature type . 2024
Data sources: Datacite
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/36...
Other literature type . 2024
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

informe pericial químico en la determinación de residuales de disparos

تقرير خبير كيميائي في تحديد بقايا الطلقات النارية
Authors: Matias Meza;

informe pericial químico en la determinación de residuales de disparos

Abstract

Cet article vise à analyser un rapport d'expertise produit par le domaine de la chimie légale dans la détermination des résidus de tir. L'objectif est d'examiner s'il dispose des informations nécessaires pour évaluer la qualité des connaissances d'experts, en tenant compte des exigences d'une procédure régulière. Pour atteindre cet objectif, tout d'abord, le contenu du rapport sera décrit par rapport aux règles de procédure et à la pratique des experts, en mettant l'accent sur les aspects formels de celui-ci. Dans la deuxième partie, l'accent sera mis sur les aspects substantiels, en mettant en évidence le contenu des connaissances spécialisées et en évaluant la qualité des connaissances spécialisées dans le cas particulier, en essayant de comprendre la logique sous-jacente du raisonnement d'expert. Enfin, dans la troisième partie, des réflexions et des recommandations d'amélioration, liées aux points précédents, seront présentées dans le but de contribuer à la qualité des connaissances spécialisées, essentielles pour garantir un processus juridique approprié.

Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar un informe pericial producido por el área de química legal en la determinación de residuos de disparo. La finalidad es examinar si el mismo cuenta con la información necesaria para evaluar la calidad del conocimiento experto, considerando las exigencias del debido proceso. Para alcanzar este propósito, en primer lugar, se describirá el contenido del informe en relación con la normativa procesal y la práctica pericial, con un enfoque en los aspectos formales del mismo. En la segunda parte, se hará hincapié en los aspectos sustanciales, resaltando el contenido del conocimiento especializado y evaluando la calidad del conocimiento experto en el caso particular, tratando de comprender la lógica subyacente en el razonamiento pericial. Finalmente, en la tercera parte, se presentarán reflexiones y recomendaciones de mejora, relacionadas con los puntos anteriores, con el propósito de contribuir a la calidad del conocimiento especializado, esencial para garantizar un proceso legal adecuado.

This article aims to analyze an expert report produced by the area of legal chemistry in the determination of firing residues. The purpose is to examine whether it has the necessary information to evaluate the quality of expert knowledge, considering the requirements of due process. To achieve this purpose, first, the content of the report will be described in relation to procedural regulations and expert practice, with a focus on the formal aspects of it. In the second part, emphasis will be placed on the substantial aspects, highlighting the content of the specialized knowledge and evaluating the quality of the expert knowledge in the particular case, trying to understand the logic underlying the expert reasoning. Finally, in the third part, reflections and recommendations for improvement will be presented, related to the previous points, in order to contribute to the quality of specialized knowledge, essential to guarantee an adequate legal process.

تهدف هذه المقالة إلى تحليل تقرير خبير أنتجه مجال الكيمياء القانونية في تحديد مخلفات إطلاق النار. والغرض من ذلك هو فحص ما إذا كان لديه المعلومات اللازمة لتقييم جودة معرفة الخبراء، مع مراعاة متطلبات الإجراءات القانونية الواجبة. ولتحقيق هذا الغرض، سيتم أولاً وصف محتوى التقرير فيما يتعلق باللوائح الإجرائية وممارسات الخبراء، مع التركيز على الجوانب الرسمية منه. في الجزء الثاني، سيتم التركيز على الجوانب الجوهرية، مع تسليط الضوء على محتوى المعرفة المتخصصة وتقييم جودة معرفة الخبراء في الحالة المعينة، ومحاولة فهم المنطق الذي يقوم عليه تفكير الخبراء. أخيرًا، في الجزء الثالث، سيتم تقديم أفكار وتوصيات للتحسين، تتعلق بالنقاط السابقة، من أجل المساهمة في جودة المعرفة المتخصصة، الضرورية لضمان عملية قانونية كافية.

Related Organizations
Keywords

contenido mínimo, debido proceso, FOS: Political science, pericia química, K201-487, Life Sciences, razonamiento experto, Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food, Analytical Chemistry, informe pericial, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Chemistry, FOS: Chemical sciences, Physical Sciences, Jurisprudence. Philosophy and theory of law, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Sample Preparation, Political science, Analytical Chemistry Techniques, Food Science, Application of Partially Ordered Sets in Chemistry Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold