
doi: 10.6035/recerca.5600
En este artículo se analizan las funciones y los efectos que ha tenido la democracia directa en Uruguay, especialmente en los últimos años (2005-2021). Se estudian los plebiscitos y los referendos que efectivamente se realizaron y también aquellos que se iniciaron y no se concretaron por no lograr las firmas o las adhesiones necesarias. El principal objetivo de esta investigación es mostrar que los mecanismos de democracia directa constituyen una vía institucional que canalizan y dan voz al descontento social, contribuyendo a evitar el déficit democrático y el estallido social.
Democracia Directa, B1-5802, Uruguay, Sociology (General), Democratización, Philosophy (General), HM401-1281
Democracia Directa, B1-5802, Uruguay, Sociology (General), Democratización, Philosophy (General), HM401-1281
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
