Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comportamiento postcosecha del tomate (lycopersicom esculentum) variedad chonto empleando soluciones de cloruro de calcio (CaCl2) para su conservación

Authors: Claudia Milena Caviedes Martínez; Pedro José Fragoso Castilla; Rosmiro Elias Peña Córdoba;

Comportamiento postcosecha del tomate (lycopersicom esculentum) variedad chonto empleando soluciones de cloruro de calcio (CaCl2) para su conservación

Abstract

La investigación propuesta fue ejecutada en la planta piloto y en el laboratorio de fisicoquímica de la Universidad Popular del Cesar, sede Valledupar. Se enmarcó dentro de los procesos de almacenamiento y vida útil del tomate después de cosechado utilizando como sal retardante el Cloruro de Calcio (CaCl2). Se almacenaron 240 unidades de tomate de la variedad Chonto, a una temperatura de 12° C por un tiempo de 8 semanas. Se empleó un diseño experimental completamente al azar con cinco tratamientos (tratamiento testigo T1 con 0 % de Cloruro de Calcio, T2 con 4 % de Cloruro de Calcio, T3 con 8 % de cloruro de calcio, T4 con 12 % de Cloruro de Calcio y T5 con 16 % de cloruro de calcio) y tres repeticiones. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizó el software estadístico PASW statistics 18 con un nivel de confianza del 95%. Se evaluaron características físicas (pérdida de peso, firmeza, cambio de color); y químicas (sólidos solubles totales, Acidez titulable y pH). Para los análisis físicos el tratamiento que presentó mayor pérdida de peso y firmeza fue el T1 con 0 % de cloruro de calcio, mostrando diferencias estadísticas con respecto al T5 con 16 % de Cloruro de Calcio que presento los valores más bajos. En los análisis químicos no se encontró diferencias significativas entre los tratamientos.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!