Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Al-Aqlu Jurnal Matem...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Al-Aqlu Jurnal Matematika Teknik dan Sains
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

JENIS KESALAHAN PADA PEMBUKTIAN MATEMATIS: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (SLR)

The Types Of Errors In Mathematical Proof: Systematic Literature Review (SLR)
Authors: null M. Fauzan Zannurrain; null Rusi Ulfa Hasanah; null Sulthon Zulkarnain Siregar;

JENIS KESALAHAN PADA PEMBUKTIAN MATEMATIS: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (SLR)

Abstract

This research aims to conduct a literature review related to the types of errors in mathematical proofs. The research method used in this study is Systematic Literature Review (SLR). From the search results on Google Scholar, a total of 24 articles were found. These were then filtered according to specified criteria, which included only journal articles and excluded proceedings, theses, and dissertations. Articles from the period between 2017 and 2024 were considered, resulting in 22 articles after exclusion. Further screening was done based on the accreditation level of the journals (1-3) and reading the abstracts to assess their relevance to the research topic, which yielded 9 articles suitable for this study. The findings of this research indicate five main categories of errors: conceptual errors, logical errors, procedural errors, representation errors, and communication errors

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold