
This research aims to conduct a literature review related to the types of errors in mathematical proofs. The research method used in this study is Systematic Literature Review (SLR). From the search results on Google Scholar, a total of 24 articles were found. These were then filtered according to specified criteria, which included only journal articles and excluded proceedings, theses, and dissertations. Articles from the period between 2017 and 2024 were considered, resulting in 22 articles after exclusion. Further screening was done based on the accreditation level of the journals (1-3) and reading the abstracts to assess their relevance to the research topic, which yielded 9 articles suitable for this study. The findings of this research indicate five main categories of errors: conceptual errors, logical errors, procedural errors, representation errors, and communication errors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
