
doi: 10.59613/a5dttq07
This research aims to develop a waste pollution module using the Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) model. The module was developed using the ADDIE development model which consists of five stages, namely analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The validity of this development module refers to the results of validation by validators who are teaching materials experts, material experts and field practitioners. The practicality of this module refers to the results of assessments by users (students). The research results show that the module developed meets validity and practicality. The module validity percentage according to the teaching subject expert validator was 93.26%, the matter expert was 100%, and the field practitioner was 95.12%. The percentage of practicality according to the students responses questionnaires were 80.53%.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
