
doi: 10.59403/2cgm6w
This article comments on the dialogue and cooperation between the ECJ and the referring court in the context of a preliminary ruling procedure. The author discusses how the ECJ and the referring court can influence and improve this relationship. Important elements of dialogue include questions, answers and process. The author discusses these elements in the context of the preliminary ruling procedure, addressing possible reasons for the criticism that has been levelled against ECJ preliminary rulings. Among other things, the author suggests allowing the referring court to be present and speak at the oral hearing of a case before the ECJ.
SAI 2007-05 FA
SAI 2007-05 FA
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
