
doi: 10.59403/26fcnd8
In this article, the authors discuss the so-called “Danish cases”, T Danmark (Case C-116/16) and Y Denmark (Case C-117/16), in which the Danish tax authorities denied the benefits of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive under the EU abuse-of-law concept.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
