
There is no unanimity or common opinion on the issue which form of government is more progressive, advanced and beneficial for the society: monarchy or republic. It is beyond dispute which of the two forms of government was created first; yet, both forms of government have indisputably sustained significant changes in the course of their historical development. Anyway, in contemporary monarchies, the role of the Monarch is largely ceremonious. Notwithstanding all the advantages and disadvantages of these two forms of government, the author is of the opinion that the most prominent difference in the operation of the monarchy and the republic lies in the fact that the private and the public interests of the monarch largely coincide, which may not be the case in the republican form of government. Besides, citizens frequently associate the concept of monarchy with some unrealistic (almost mythical) features and imagery.
historical changes, monarchy, form of government, removability and electivity, K, public authorities, Law, republic
historical changes, monarchy, form of government, removability and electivity, K, public authorities, Law, republic
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
