Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Job Satisfaction

Authors: Gloria Carson;

Job Satisfaction

Abstract

The purpose of the researcher was to investigate job satisfaction for employees of a utility company which has facilities in 33 northwest Kansas counties. The sample consisted of 96 employees. The following independent variables were investigated: age, gender, income, formal education, and job security. The dependent variables were scores from the following scales of the Job Satisfaction Survey: Pay, Promotion, Supervision, Benefits, Contingent Rewards, Operating Procedures, Co-Workers, Nature of Work, Communication, and Total Satisfaction. Five composite null hypotheses were tested using a three-way analysis of variance (general linear model). A total of 180 comparisons were made plus 150 recurring. Of the 180, 50 were for main effects and 130 were for interactions. Of the 50 main effects, 18 were statistically significant at the .05 level. The results of the present study appeared to support the following generalization: 1. Individuals with income of $40,001 and greater have greater job satisfaction than those with less income, 2. Males have greater job satisfaction for the variable Nature of Work than females, 3. Males have greater Total Satisfaction than females, 4. Individuals with high job security have greater job satisfaction for the variable Promotion than those with low job security, 5. Individuals with high job security have greater Total Satisfaction than those of low job security, and 6. Statistically significant interactions for 17 comparisons.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!